Categories
she lit newsletter

Another Famous Author Complains About Diversity

SHE LIT: Another Famous Author Complains About Diversity 😒
Logo

📚 Join the #shelitbookclub! The August book club pick will be announced in the next three days. Details can be found here.

Photo by ready made: https://www.pexels.com/photo/composed-books-on-white-marble-background-3847626/

Pity for White male authors continues as Joyce Carol Oates joins tone-deaf chorus

Famous White female author Joyce Carol Oates tweeted a weeks-old op-ed from The New York Times about the banned books movement. Like famous White male author James Patterson earlier this summer complaining about the lack of “52-year-old White male authors,” Joyce stuck her foot in her mouth by expressing the hardships young White male authors are dealing with now due to the social justice movement around banned books.

In her July 24 tweet that has an estimated 12,200 likes, Joyce says she’s been hearing from a literary agent friend that young White male authors are having a hard time getting their debut novels in front of editors. These editors, according to her tweet referring to one unnamed literary agent, are no longer interested in reading these works because of the writers’ race and gender.

It’s problematic having these very established authors express their opinions about diversity, equity, and inclusion in publishing based on what a friend, who most likely is also White, is telling them in confidence. Non-White authors have always had a more difficult time to even get to the first step of attaining a literary agent, so saying White authors are having issues getting their books published doesn’t sound believable.

For some of the most active women of color authors on Twitter, The 1619 Project creator and journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones ripped Joyce for using an anonymous source and wanting “to be oppressed so badly.” Romance novelist Courtney Milan reminded us that Joyce told fantasy YA author and publisher Dhonielle Clayton in 2017 “to start her own publishing company if she felt excluded” and added that Joyce is a “racist.”

Joyce doubled down in another tweet, saying, “This is what is most astonishing about writers like Rimbaud, Keats, Hemingway, Carson McCullers, John Cheever, John Updike–they began writing well so young, & some might argue that their strongest writing was their earliest.” So, she’s implying publishing overall is in trouble because in her opinion the industry is losing its brightest stars, which historically have been overwhelmingly White male.

All this hoopla is swirling as Netflix announced its film adaptation of Joyce’s 2000 biographical fiction book Blonde, based on the life of Marilyn Monroe. The press around the film, which is expected to be available for streaming later this year, seems to be unaffected by the #BookTwitter controversy.

Publishing her first novel in 1963, Joyce, now 84, has written 58 books with five of those, including Blonde, becoming finalists for the Pulitzer Prize. Though she’s considered an industry treasure, her off-the-cuff remarks in relation to diversity, equity, and inclusion reached a height with this recent fiasco.

Banned books across the political and racial spectrum are causing concerns. The NYT op-ed that was referenced in Joyce’s Twitter argument mentions how books featuring and written by Black and queer authors are seeing bans across the country while former Vice President Mike Pence’s book deal saw protests from Simon & Schuster employees.

Dana Canedy, who recently stepped down as S&S publisher, stood her ground to support Pence’s book though she’s Black. As a journalist, she knew that the Trump administration official’s story as well as stories by Black nonfiction authors are needed to fight censorship.

While there is data on how people of color are largely underrepresented as publishing industry employees and as authors and illustrators, the data is not showing any issues with White male authors not being given book deals. If you look at most literary agencies where the majority of agents are usually White female, almost their entire clientele is White with other dominating identities such as cisgender, heterosexual, Christian or atheist.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion is an overarching problem; the only thing now is the underrepresented groups in publishing are louder in their fight for equality and balance thanks to social media. Bookstores may be prioritizing books by people of color and by LGBTQIA+ authors in the front of their windows now because they never had done that before. At the end of the day, it’s the publishing industry’s duty to make sure all stories, if well-balanced and fair, are published to represent all readers.

Saying you heard from your friend in the industry that an unproven trend is happening is not helpful to the discourse. At least, wait for the data to prove the trend, then we can have that conversation on censorship.

she lit editor + chief content creator

Check out past newsletters!

What we’re highlighting

Hulu orders series based on publishing workplace drama novel

The Other Black Girl is one of the latest book-to-TV screen adaptation deals in Hollywood from Disney’s Onyx Collection. The best-selling 2021 novel by Zakiya Dalila Harris centers on Nella, who is exhausted being the only Black woman in her publishing house’s office until Hazel, another Black woman, arrives on the scene. Hazel becomes a rising star while Nella seems to fade more into the background. The series, which counts the author and Rashida Jones as executive producers, will stream on Hulu. The book is published by Atria Books imprint of Simon & Schuster.

Maison Valentino, 826LA reup support for writing program

The Children of Blood and Bone series fantasy young adult novelist Tomi Adeyemi, Italian fashion house Maison Valentino, and Los Angeles youth nonprofit 826LA are partnering to provide scholarships to 50 emerging authors. They had partnered in December 2020 to give 50 recipients scholarships who had applied on Instagram to attend The Writer’s Roadmap, the masterclass created by Tomi to help writers develop their skills.

“The opportunity to encourage the pursuit of culture, art and literature, supporting students from diverse backgrounds in making their voices heard, represents an important step on the brand’s path toward social sustainability,” Maison Valentino wrote in a press release.

Nic Stone reveals new YA novel focused on mental health

Best known for her 2017 social justice YA debut Dear Martin, Nic Stone announced on Instagram that her next book received a second chance. Technically her first novel, Nic says Chaos Theory, which centers on Black teens with “abnormal brain chemistry,” was the book she was trying to sell in 2015 as her debut. “It wasn’t the right time,” she wrote in the post. Nic’s newest release is slated for February 2023 and considered a triumph for other authors who had seen their earlier works receive rejections but are able to sell them later after establishing themselves in the marketplace.

August book club picks to add to your #TBR list:

What we’re reviewing

"Red Clocks" by Leni Zumas

Book Review: Red Clocks by Leni Zumas

What we’re reading

What we’re watching

Apply for bookish job

Want your book and bookish news to be featured? Write us at shewrites@shelit.com.

Forward this newsletter to friends!

Categories
she lit newsletter

A Discussion on Banned Books Looks at Disinformation

<![CDATA[SHE LIT: A Discussion on Banned Books Looks at Disinformation]]> https://mailchi.mp/729f922e52fe/a-discussion-on-banned-books-looks-at-disinformation https://mailchi.mp/729f922e52fe/a-discussion-on-banned-books-looks-at-disinformation SHE LIT: A Discussion on Banned Books Looks at Disinformation
Logo

📚 Join the #shelitbookclub on July 31 as we discuss the novel Red Clocks by Leni Zumas amid the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Details can be found here.

Words get twisted after an author and librarian discuss banned books at event

Over the last week, the American Library Association hosted its 2022 Annual Conference and Exhibition in Washington, D.C., and a panel about banned books became a hot topic on #BookTwitter with numerous authors and librarians alike sharing their opinions.

From the social media comments, young adult best-selling author and banned books ambassador Jason Reynolds was attacked over the assumption he supported Holocaust denial books being made available at libraries. Nancy Pearl, an author dubbed “Seattle’s most famous librarian” by The Seattle Times who was sitting on the Unite Against Book Bans panel last Saturday, implied she felt bad for keeping Holocaust denial books on library shelves because they’re “needed.”

So, should books that promote disinformation and misinformation like Holocaust denial books be banned from libraries?

What sparked the firestorm is a tweet that went viral on #BookTwitter from librarian Kelsey Bogan who said the panel seemed to have a “sentiment” that Holocaust denial books should stay on library shelves.

“What did I not want to add in the collection? Personally, I did not want to add Holocaust-denying books. That was offensive to me. Did I think we needed them? Sad to say, yes,” said Nancy, who is Jewish, as quoted in the panel’s livestream viewed by Jewish Insider. “But we talk about — we’re anti, we shouldn’t ban books. It’s much more nuanced and it’s much more difficult than one often tends to think that it is.”

As the Black male author on the panel, Jason seemed to be more in the crossfire than Nancy when it came to social media commentary.

Further in her Twitter thread, Kelsey says Jason “did not initiate the comment but did verbally agree/state it too, sort of against his better judgement?” Jason tweeted in response to Kelsey that he may have been “inarticulately trying to say” his thoughts on the subject of Holocaust denial books in reference to banned books.

But the main Black Twitterverse authors Dhonielle Clayton, Bethany C. Morrow, and LL McKinney said the barrage of negative comments about Jason over the panel is an example of anti-Blackness since the author never made the original comment, but due to his proximity to Nancy the commenter, he became more than fair game on social media. They and other supporters of Jason noted that the apologies and clarifications from Nancy and Kelsey came days later, enough time for more tweets to be written up against Jason.

For a bit of background, books that deny the Holocaust, promote gay conversion, claim abortion is murder, or recommend vaccines kill people, for example, usually are not under the umbrella of banned books. They tend to stay on shelves, if libraries allow them, unless an individual or group advocate for their removal from a library.

Most books are banned from libraries after concerns have been brought up about the books being read by children. The books that usually see bans center on the diversity of experiences dealing with race, religion, gender, and sexual orientation.

The conversation was really about library collection development policies, according to Unite Against Book Bans, a national initiative supporting the fight against censorship and the panel sponsor. Nancy, in her words, tried to say she has put Holocaust denial books on library shelves because it’s still literature that should be accessible.

She said the same thing in a 2017 article for The World. Here’s a snippet from the article:

Pearl says there have been times where she’s come across a book she doesn’t agree with or finds offensive. This is a time where she says she has to give herself a “stern talking to.”

Books promoting Holocaust denial have come to Pearl’s library. She puts them on the shelf, regardless of her opinion.

“It wouldn’t be a library if there weren’t books that annoyed people.”

Ultimately, she says, reading makes people more compassionate. “It makes us get outside ourselves.” Something she feels people need to do more and more in today’s political and cultural climate.

The banned books movement is to ensure books covering different experiences are made available to readers, especially children depending on the reading level and genre. The fate of books that could be classified as misinformation defined as incorrect or misleading information, or disinformation defined as false information deliberately and often covertly spread in order to influence public opinion or obscure the truth, is still up in the air.

she lit editor + chief content creator

Subscribe to the she lit newsletter!

What’s new on the blog

Jenny Han Talks Asian Representation in Books on ‘The Summer I Turned Pretty’ Tour

What we’re highlighting

Macmillan sees book sales impacted by cybersecurity attack

Publishing giant Macmillan Publishers saw its computer systems become compromised by a data breach this week. Industry news outlet Publishers Lunch reported the “security incident” on Monday and said Macmillan noticed the incident on Saturday and had to close its offices for most of the week.

Staffers took to Twitter to say they were slowly gaining access back into their Google Suite tools, including Gmail.

Bookstores said they weren’t able to place orders with Macmillan, which ultimately is impacting book sales, reported the Wall Street Journal. As of today, orders can be placed in the U.S. but not processed, according to Publishers Lunch.

Third book in Tomi Adeyemi’s best-selling series announced

The third novel from Tomi Adeyemi’s Legacy of Orisha fantasy YA series is titled Children of Anguish and Anarchy, according to the author’s Instagram post on Monday. In two photos featuring blue sticky notes, one photo shows the title while the next one reads “Destruction is a form of creation.” The book follows the record-breaking Children of Blood and Bone and the 2019 follow-up Children of Virtue and Vengeance.

On the Come Up film trailer debuts at BET Awards

Angie Thomas of The Hate U Give fame will see her sophomore novel on the big screen. On the Come Up features Bri, an up-and-coming teen rapper trying to follow in her late father’s footsteps. The trailer was first seen on the BET Awards last Sunday. Set to be released on Paramount+, the movie will be actress Sanaa Lathan’s directorial debut. Sanaa has been involved in book-to-TV projects such as the 2000 film Disappearing Acts based on Terry McMillan’s novel of the same name.

What we’re reviewing

What we’re reading

What we’re watching

Apply for bookish job

Want your book and bookish news to be featured? Write us at shewrites@shelit.com.

Forward this newsletter to friends!

]]>
Categories
what's lit

We Need Diverse Books Stops Using #OwnVoices Term

The nonprofit initiative to have more children’s books reflect all identities in the literary industry says it will no longer use the #OwnVoices hashtag.

We Need Diverse Books announced Sunday that it has scrubbed mentions of the #OwnVoices hashtag from its website posts and plan to identify authors and their characters specifically by their race, ethnicity, religion, ability, sexual orientation, and gender.

The term #OwnVoices became an industry standard when fantasy and sci-fi young adult novelist Corinne Duyvis suggested the hashtag on Twitter in September 2015 to label kidlit work by mostly non-White authors writing about characters that share their identity. It has evolved into a mainstay in the book Twitterverse, particularly as a preferred hashtag in pitch parties such as #PitMad and #DVPit where authors query their books in 280 characters to attract literary agents. Many literary agents still ask for the term to be included in subject lines for authors who are querying their work via email.

“I’m thrilled that #ownvoices has taken on its own life in the years since then,” Corinne writes on her website. “It’s easy shorthand for a necessary concept, and the hashtag is filled with brilliant recommendations, questions, and discussions. That’s awesome. I’m happy to [sic] for the Tweets above to be the extent of my involvement, as the hashtag has been doing just fine without my input; I don’t want to moderate or regulate the discussion in any way.”

We Need Diverse Books says the term was never supposed to grow into an industry marketing “catchall.”

“Using #OwnVoices in this capacity raises issues due to the vagueness of the term, which has then been used to place diverse creators in uncomfortable and potentially unsafe situations,” the organization writes. “It is important to use the language that authors want to celebrate about themselves and their characters.”